Posts Tagged ‘transportation’

BMW’s Better Half

Monday, October 20th, 2008

The Mini.

The only thing I don’t like about the Minis so far is that they have Chrysler engines (technically a Chrysler-BMW joint venture, but still). Other than that I have no complaints. And thanks to PhillyCarShare I have 2 Mini options at my fingertips within a 5-block radius. Around town the Mini is swift, highly maneuverable, can fit into just about any parking space, and despite it being so low to the ground I don’t have any of the blind spot issues that I frequently experience in other cars (like the Toyota Prius which is HORRIBLE despite its great concept and my love for Toyotas). They are even fun for long distance (I’ve driven up to 100-mile trips, combination of highway and state roads). Even the automatics are fun. Plus, they average around 26-37mpg city/highway. Although I have heard complaints about the trunk space (or lack thereof), I think of it this way: the Mini is a “ME” car, and that’s what I’m talkin’ ’bout! I haven’t had this much fun driving since before my brother crashed my old 1991 Saab 900S (with over 250,000 miles on her!).

AND NOW, MORE EXCITING THAN EVER [horns sound]:

Introducing

The Mine-e!

Emissions-free with a 100% electric motor, 500 of these puppies are hitting the streets within the next few months. Powered by a lithium-ion battery pack that (for now) reduces the car to a 2-seater, it can travel up to around 150miles before needing to be recharged, which it can do using any standard outlet. However, BMW is also supplying special “wallbox” units to fully restore the car in 2.5hrs.

A leap beyond the now popularized ‘hybrids’, I can’t wait to test drive it! So, while I condemn some of BMW’s advertising strategies, it’s innovation like this that gets me behind their wheels when public transit isn’t an option.

Make your own 3D mini!

MINI Space

BMW Ad

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

So BMW put up a number of advertisements along the Septa R5 rail line a little bit ago including this one:

Last night I attended a lecture by Enrique Peñalosa, a visiting scholar at NYU and former mayor of Bogotá, Columbia. In his 3-year tenure as mayor he was responsible for promoting a city model that prioritized children, public spaces and public transportation while restricting private car use.

The biggest question for cities and urban planning is how do we want to live? A city should prioritize human needs. So far wealth, income and production have been the qualities that have come to define our urban centers. However in the global spectrum these values are incomparable standards, especially when contrasting the success of a developed country’s cities to those of a developing country. Peñalosa suggests the value we need to prioritize as a global community is HAPPINESS. And in order to incorporate happiness into planning models, people need the following:

  • to walk
  • to be with people
  • to have contact with nature
  • to play
  • not to feel inferior

By cultivating these values, a truly democratic city is born: a city where public good prevails over private interest and public transit/ greenways/ bicycle & pedestrian-only promenades/ walking/ cars are all given equal access to land. This model is most efficient when high frequency is coupled with low cost, and for this reason depends on higher density.

Emphasis on car access including widening highways and building elevated freeways kills the city. Studies have shown that elevated highways are directly proportional to increases in crime and declining property values. Widening highways is directly proportional to putting more drivers on the road and increasing travel distance, making traffic jams even worse.

So, while I do have a certain affinity for BMW’s torque : horsepower ratio, I find their latest advertisements disastrous, especially when they’re targeting mass-transit users.

Links:

Enrique Peñalosa