Archive for October, 2008

COMMyouNITY

Monday, October 27th, 2008

The individual is an important factor in taking care of the environment. However, we all factor in to the larger community, and often times we are more inspired to nurture, protect and participate when we see others doing the same. We learn from each other and from our surroundings. And there is perhaps nothing more disappointing than when we see someone trashing something that we have just worked so hard to clean up. On the other hand, people are less likely to disrespect/ vandalize/ trash a clean environment and especially one that the whole community visibly takes care of.

When I was about 7 years old, I experienced this directly. It had been an especially dry and I remember making trips to a local spring about 5-10 miles from our house since our well had gone dry. The mouth of the stream fed by the spring was littered with a few plastic grocery bags and items that looked like someone had cleaned out their car: soda bottles, cigarette boxes, tissue, candy wrappers, and beer cans. I still relive the stunning feeling of disbelief that someone would carelessly discard their waste at the very source of natural sustenance. It seemed so strongly against the very basic instinct that all creatures share: don’t shit where you eat (or sleep, for that matter).

On future trips to the spring, more garbage had showed up. Eventually, someone’s kitchen scraps (I remember eggshells) made it to the stream. I don’t remember who suggested it, but my mother and I decided one day to take trash bags along with us on our trip to the spring and clean up the disgusting mess. I think we even separated out the bottles and cans to be recycled. From that time on, as long as we frequented the spring for our water, no more trash showed up. This was such a valuable lesson that has stayed with me ever since: the earth is everybody’s and nobody’s at the same time; if you don’t take care of it, where will you live? What I mean by that is to treat the environment with the same respect and honor with which you treat your own house/ yard/ apartment. And when you see others have trashed it, take the initiative to clean it up - whether it means you pick up a stray flier or cellophane wrapper on the sidewalk, or organize a community “block cleaning day.”

When people see other people engaging in a specific activity, it is human nature that a personal thought process/ recognition develops in response to the observation. Whether the observer’s conclusion happens to be “weirdo” or “that’s a good idea”, the next time they see trash on the sidewalk or actually throw trash on the sidewalk they may recall that time they saw someone cleaning it up. It may take many similar observances before they start thinking about it, or it may not change anything at all, but it has two very positive possibilities: that the community will take care of their environment, and that it may inspire others to do the same.

The relationship of the individual to the community is one of many micro-to-macrocosm relationships that exist. I point this out because when it comes to our own role within the universe, we can find ways to downplay our individual importance/ significance when it works out to be convenient. I’m sure we can all think of a situation where we said “what difference would me doing ‘x’ make?” However, when you start to multiply individual participation across the spectrum of the community/ world, you can only increase the benefits. Unless of course you do nothing and then 1×0 = 0. And who really wants to be a nobody?

You don’t have to go all out and reform your entire lifestyle to have an impact; just being conscious of what your lifestyle is, being comfortable with the choices you do make, and being aware of your surroundings can have a positive effect. And if you see a way that you can honor and give back to the greater community, then all the better.

The Three R’s

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

We have all heard of the three R’s:

Reduce - Reuse - Recycle

Recycling is a no-brainer. At this point it has been made fairly mainstream and requires minimal effort to separate what we throw out, though some municipalities additionally require sorting. For this task I find it easiest to keep smaller, individual paper bags/ trash cans alongside the regular trash can; one for plastic/ glass/ aluminum and the other for paper. When they’re full, they get emptied into the appropriate receptacles outside in the alley. Some people simply set recycling aside to take out at the end of the day. The key is to find what works for your living situation and to try and simplify it. From food containers to beauty supplies, laundry detergent bottles, junk mail and old newspapers/ magazines, product packaging is becoming increasingly recyclable.  The trick is to take inventory of what you use, and try to recycle it all - or at least as much as possible.  And be sure to check with your municipality for a list of what is recyclable; most of this information is easily found online.

Some items you can even “recycle” by re-using within your household, such as glass/ plastic food containers to store leftovers, newspapers as mess-mats for gardening/ craft projects, and scrap paper can be cut into squares and re-used for notes/ grocery lists. Some lotion/ other beauty product containers make good hair accessory holders, or can be used to store homemade bath salts/ teas/ potpourri. That pair of nylons that sprung a run can be cut into rings and used as hair elastics, or strips and used for staking/ tying back plants in the garden. Packaging, wrapping paper and cards can all be re-used and cut up to make new cards/ wrapping paper/ various other arts & crafts projects. Packaging is actually my biggest pet peeve; items are increasingly wrapped in more and more layers of needless waste. Yet this is a perfect example of ‘less is more’ for consumers, manufacturers and the environment; manufacturers save money by using less packaging, it’s less strain on natural resources, and it’s less hassle and waste for everyone else.

As for reducing, this requires a little more effort and is made especially hard by our consumer mentality and notions that “bigger is better.” But there are some simple areas that we can all relate to and address here; the rest is ultimately up to you to determine on a personal basis.

  • Transportation - can you walk/ bike/ take public transit instead of driving?
  • Shopping - can you reduce fuel, packaging and waste? Can you buy it concentrated? Is there a local option? Is the packaging reusable or biodegradable? Is there a manufacturer that invests in sustainable business practices?
  • Energy - turn the lights off when you leave a room, use cold water instead of hot to wash clothes, weatherstop your windows in the winter if you live in a cold climate, use cotton towels in lieu of paper towels to dry hands in the bathroom and kitchen, if you’re a homeowner consider investing in a solar hot water heater, etc.
  • Chemicals - are there natural/ plant-based alternatives? (think detergents, cleaners, soaps, disinfectants, chlorine-free bleach, etc.) Does it contain parabens (cancer-causing preservatives)?

Beginning to think like this doesn’t happen overnight. But if you start off at a smaller scale and select just one or a few items you regularly use and explore how that choice could make the least impact on the environment, you begin to get into the habit of asking these questions. Soon it becomes second nature. And in this economy, it’ll save you money too - even more reason to ponder the options.

What is green?

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

I think I’m suffering from writer’s cramp already. Or is it the overwhelming amount of information out there that I want to share with my readers and am having a hard time narrowing down to just one? Based on how this entry is shaping up, it must be the latter. The next few blog entries are going to break down the basic issues of sustainability affecting our everyday lifestyles in digestible, bite-size pieces.

What is green? And greenwashing? Why do I care? How does it affect you? The planet? Everything.

First let’s get the ugly right out in the open. Greenwashing: the best definition I found on the Internet that really pinpoints what greenwashing is came from LOHAS.com (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability, aka my favorite new website). According to LOHAS, “greenwashing is a superficial nod to the environment that marketers and businesses that historically were not interested in sustainable concerns, are doing in order to improve their public relation standings with the consumer or public. Analogous to brainwashing.” Greenwashing can sometimes lead to positive outcomes in cases where companies decide to make a serious commitment to protecting, caring for or improving the environment - any amount of effort down this path only stands to make our Earth a better place. However, continuing to invest in destructive economic, social or environmental practices for the sheer yield of profits is not only detrimental to the planet, it is a business model that will eventually fail over time as natural resources are depleted.

The best example of greenwashing I have come across so far is this:

The Human Element. Beautiful, right? It’s a really touching message, and some great footage. In all seriousness. For DOW Chemical Company?! DOW makes just about everything. A quick glimpse of their product inventory includes:

  • Agricultural and Food
  • Automotive and Transportation
  • Building & Construction
  • Coatings and Adhesives
  • Electronics and Appliances
  • Fiber/Textiles, Footwear
  • Flooring
  • Furniture and Bedding
  • Health & Medical
  • Home and Personal Care
  • Oil & Gas/ Chemical Processing
  • Packaging & Films
  • Water
  • Wire & Cable

If that doesn’t cover every chemical industry in the world and every aspect of our lives, I don’t know what does. This is exactly what sustainability is all about. Everything we do on a daily basis is affected.

The EPA defines sustainability as “environmental protection [that] does not preclude economic development and that economic development must be ecologically viable now and in the long run. Common use of the term “sustainability” began with the 1987 publication of the World Commission on Environment and Development report, Our Common Future. Also known as the Brundtland Report, this document defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” This concept of sustainability encompasses ideas, aspirations and values that continue to inspire public and private organizations to become better stewards of the environment and that promote positive economic growth and social objectives. The principles of sustainability can stimulate technological innovation, advance competitiveness, and improve our quality of life.”

What have you done for yourself that also benefited the environment lately?

The next post will narrow down our focus a little bit and hone in on some simple ways to start thinking sustainably.

BMW’s Better Half

Monday, October 20th, 2008

The Mini.

The only thing I don’t like about the Minis so far is that they have Chrysler engines (technically a Chrysler-BMW joint venture, but still). Other than that I have no complaints. And thanks to PhillyCarShare I have 2 Mini options at my fingertips within a 5-block radius. Around town the Mini is swift, highly maneuverable, can fit into just about any parking space, and despite it being so low to the ground I don’t have any of the blind spot issues that I frequently experience in other cars (like the Toyota Prius which is HORRIBLE despite its great concept and my love for Toyotas). They are even fun for long distance (I’ve driven up to 100-mile trips, combination of highway and state roads). Even the automatics are fun. Plus, they average around 26-37mpg city/highway. Although I have heard complaints about the trunk space (or lack thereof), I think of it this way: the Mini is a “ME” car, and that’s what I’m talkin’ ’bout! I haven’t had this much fun driving since before my brother crashed my old 1991 Saab 900S (with over 250,000 miles on her!).

AND NOW, MORE EXCITING THAN EVER [horns sound]:

Introducing

The Mine-e!

Emissions-free with a 100% electric motor, 500 of these puppies are hitting the streets within the next few months. Powered by a lithium-ion battery pack that (for now) reduces the car to a 2-seater, it can travel up to around 150miles before needing to be recharged, which it can do using any standard outlet. However, BMW is also supplying special “wallbox” units to fully restore the car in 2.5hrs.

A leap beyond the now popularized ‘hybrids’, I can’t wait to test drive it! So, while I condemn some of BMW’s advertising strategies, it’s innovation like this that gets me behind their wheels when public transit isn’t an option.

Make your own 3D mini!

MINI Space

BMW Ad

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

So BMW put up a number of advertisements along the Septa R5 rail line a little bit ago including this one:

Last night I attended a lecture by Enrique Peñalosa, a visiting scholar at NYU and former mayor of Bogotá, Columbia. In his 3-year tenure as mayor he was responsible for promoting a city model that prioritized children, public spaces and public transportation while restricting private car use.

The biggest question for cities and urban planning is how do we want to live? A city should prioritize human needs. So far wealth, income and production have been the qualities that have come to define our urban centers. However in the global spectrum these values are incomparable standards, especially when contrasting the success of a developed country’s cities to those of a developing country. Peñalosa suggests the value we need to prioritize as a global community is HAPPINESS. And in order to incorporate happiness into planning models, people need the following:

  • to walk
  • to be with people
  • to have contact with nature
  • to play
  • not to feel inferior

By cultivating these values, a truly democratic city is born: a city where public good prevails over private interest and public transit/ greenways/ bicycle & pedestrian-only promenades/ walking/ cars are all given equal access to land. This model is most efficient when high frequency is coupled with low cost, and for this reason depends on higher density.

Emphasis on car access including widening highways and building elevated freeways kills the city. Studies have shown that elevated highways are directly proportional to increases in crime and declining property values. Widening highways is directly proportional to putting more drivers on the road and increasing travel distance, making traffic jams even worse.

So, while I do have a certain affinity for BMW’s torque : horsepower ratio, I find their latest advertisements disastrous, especially when they’re targeting mass-transit users.

Links:

Enrique Peñalosa

Recycle Your Clothing!

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Metro (allegedly ‘The world’s largest global newspaper) has decided to publish a series ‘on the subject of the environment, the changes to our planet’ and basically what the world is doing to fight climate change (10/14/08). SO, today the paper is tinted green, and the cover feature (at least in Philadelphia’s edition) is “The dresses, dreams and drama: Project Runway.” After sifting through the murder and McCain files, the Palinometer, criminals make headlines, free market woes, and TV’s watch list sections, we finally come to p.12: “green day.” What message is conveyed regarding the priorities of environmental issues when the cover features a half-page photo-montage of Project Runway finalists?

Note: I know there are some of you thinking, “who reads the Metro for reliable coverage of news, anyway?” and I say this to you: I’m handed a free Metro every day on my way to work, and have read it cover to cover by the time I get to work where I get the BBC delivered to my inbox. With the occasional exception of the BBC’s Science / Nature and Health sections and the Metro’s Entertainment section, there is rarely any difference in headlines. The BBC’s articles may be longer, but seldom do they offer more insight than that offered in the Metro.

In my effort to make positive things out of negative thoughts, I realized clothing actually is a factor to consider in minimizing our carbon footprint. Albeit, not in the PR sense. Consider the fibers clothes are made with (apparently polyester is one of the most sustainable fibers), the dyes that are used, washing and drying instructions, where the clothes are made, and what business practices the Label company employs. What happens to old clothes is another part of the picture. I grew up with a mom who I consider to be my “Sustainable Guru” on the homefront, which is an essential part of where our core values are learned including our value of the environment and our own actions toward it. My mom can find a way to re-use just about anything, the least of it all being clothing. She saved what could of our kids clothes for hand-me-downs, and then took the items that were still in good condition after 3-kids-worth of wear down to “Little Red Wagon,” our local second-hand store. The un-salvageable got turned into rags for dusting, my dad’s paint/ stain rags, doll clothes, material for crafts projects, and for cleaning up grease/ oil in the garage. What’s great about second-hand stores is there are many who offer a commission for your items that they sell - and in my book making sweet moolah while minimizing environmental impact gets my nod of approval. For those Philadelphians out there, Green Street Consignment is a win-win situation: they only take items that are still in style so it’s not only great to unload those things that you’ll just never wear again, but they also have some great finds for relatively inexpensive prices (range: $8-$30).

Another part of minimizing our carbon footprint is to take advantage of all the local resources that surround us. For this purpose, perhaps a more appropriate feature in lieu of Project Runway for the front page of the first “Go Green” Metro issue would have been the Swap-O-Rama Rama event that I just found out about. It’s the local, sustainable version of Project Runway, and it’s coming to a place near you. SORR was started by Wendy Tremayne and brings the concept of Reduce - Re-use - Recycle to our wardrobe. This Sunday October 19th, bring a bag of your old clothes to the Old Pine Community Center at 401 Lombard Street (Philadelphia) and get ready for “A recycled do-it-yourself extravaganza.” The basics are: bring a bag of clothes and $20.00, grab a bag of your own clothes, and either take ‘em as is or attend any series of workshops from learning how to make alterations, full modifications (make a dress/ handbag out of jeans), on-site silk-screening, embellish your new digs, sew in a DIY label, etc. Use your creativity, opt to participate in an impromptu fashion show with your new wares, grab a bite to eat, there’s even a DJ.

While clothing isn’t necessarilly designed to be recyclable, test yourself and see how far you can make a single item go - see some ideas below.

Can Polyester Save the World?

Swap-O-Rama-Rama

SORR Philadelphia

Make a quilt out of your favorite old T-shirts

ThreadBanger | the first network for people who make their own fashion

Ideas for recycling clothes (World Environmental Organization)

Do It Yourself Handbags